> I am guessing that you are using a dialect 3 database, with a
> fieldtype of DATE. If you were using a field type of TIMESTAMP I dont
> think you would see this problem.

Well guessed!

> A work around for this may be to define an explicit mask of
> 'ccccccccccccccccc' (or similar).

That's what I was thinking. In our components we've already written
some date handling routines so I think I can at least get it into a
"workable" state.

We will be going to TIB_Edit probably later this year.

Thanks,

Paul.