Not sure about the performance differences. You may want to do a diff
between the SQL monitor outputs to pinpoint what it is that is causing the
difference.

As for those units which will not compile, they are not yet ported to Kylix
yet. Only the non-visual stuff is working in Kylix at this point.

Regards,
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com

-- We may not have it all together --
-- But together we have it all --

----- Original Message -----
From: <lists@...>
To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: [IBO] Performance difference between X-beta components and Windows
components


> I'm doing my initial tests on IBO Kylix beta and am noticing
> significant differences in performance between ibo windows and ibo
> kylix. Can anyone enumerate some of the issues that determine the
> performance factors on Linux?
>
> I'm running Mandrake 9 on an Intel XEON 2GHZ processor, firebird
> running on SUSE 8.x on a Dual Intel XEON 550MHZ.
>
> Using TIBODatabase and TIBOQuery, I run queries against a table that
> has almost 1.7 million rows, no binary data, just double, varchar,
> timestamp and date timestamp columns. On Windows, some queries that
> execute in less than a second will take 30 seconds to a minute on Linux.
>
> I ran into several difficulties compiling the .dpk's in Kylix. In
> addition to many case corrections (unit name case not matching source
> references), I receive the following error:
>
> [Fatal Error] ibo40vrt.dpk(39): File not found: 'ib_controls.dpu'
>
> when trying to compile/install ibo40vrt.dpk - and other packages as well
>
> Thanks in advance for any assistance.
>
> David Keith.