> > So, perhaps a lot of the bells and whistles are not necessary in light

of

> > this arrangement.
>
> couldn't agree more; I'd leave everything as it is and document it
> properly if it's not.

The arrangement I was referring to is actually insufficient and
unfortunately leaving things as they are will cause more confusion in the
future.

What I am leaning towards at the moment is to deprecate the
PasswordRemembered (to streamed public) and to put in its place the
PasswordStorage property as suggested by Geoff. It's default behavior will
be what everyone is used to in the past. I've looked over the changes and I
don't think it is going to be too complex.

I think Geoff makes a good point about how careful we need to be with
passwords and a good system that only costs one property is worth it to me.
It's certainly far less confusing than all the other LoginXXXX stuff I put
in there.

It also seemed to me that people favored the more complete approach.

FWIW,
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com