Yes, use the inline select and send the changes to me. I will gladly
incorporate all community improvements to this tool That is why I make the
full source available to it is so we can all make it better. I add a thing
or two every week it seems. Others have added some really nice things that I
enjoy too. You all know who you are!

Regards,
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nando Dessena" <nandod@...>
To: "IBO" <ibobjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 11:01 AM
Subject: [IBO] Modification to IB_WISQL


> Hello,
> I have made a small modification to IB_WISQL (more precisely to the
> IBF_Browse unit) so that you can double click on the INDEX NAME box in
> the Constraints page to automatically move to the corresponding index in
> the Indexes page, if available.
> It is really nothing special, but I find it useful so if anyone else
> needs it I can send the modified file.
>
> While we're at it, I attempted another small modification, to allow me
> to double click on the "Unique constraint in the parent" box and jump to
> that constraint.
> To do that, I needed an additional field in qrConstraintInf, so I have
> modified this SQL sentence:
>
> SELECT RC.RDB$CONSTRAINT_NAME
> , RC.RDB$CONSTRAINT_TYPE
> , RC.RDB$DEFERRABLE
> , RC.RDB$INITIALLY_DEFERRED
> , RC.RDB$INDEX_NAME
> , FC.RDB$CONST_NAME_UQ
> , FC.RDB$UPDATE_RULE
> , FC.RDB$DELETE_RULE
> , RC2.RDB$RELATION_NAME PARENT_RELATION
> FROM RDB$RELATION_CONSTRAINTS RC
> LEFT
> JOIN RDB$REF_CONSTRAINTS FC
> ON RC.RDB$CONSTRAINT_NAME = FC.RDB$CONSTRAINT_NAME
> ORDER BY RC.RDB$CONSTRAINT_NAME
>
> adding
>
> LEFT
> JOIN RDB$RELATION_CONSTRAINTS RC2
> ON FC.RDB$CONST_NAME_UQ = RC2.RDB$CONSTRAINT_NAME
>
> just before the ORDER BY, but this screws up the MasterLinks entry,
> which is
>
> RDB$RELATION_CONSTRAINTS.RDB$RELATION_NAME=RDB$RELATIONS.RDB$RELATION_NAME
>
> It appears that IBO is using the
> RDB$RELATION_CONSTRAINTS.RDB$RELATION_NAME column from RC2 and not RC.
> What should I do in such circumstances?
> For now, I have used a subselect in place of the left join, which seems
> to work OK, but I don't know whether there are better solutions.
>
> I have also made it so that the parent relation is displayed in the
> group box, and that the group box itself is not shown if the current
> constraint is not a FK.
> Any chance to include these small modifications in a next release?
>
> Ciao
> --
> ____
> _/\/ando
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>