Subject | [IBO] Re: Switching between views? |
---|---|
Author | s.beames@mailbox.gu.edu.au |
Post date | 2001-03-16T22:53:08Z |
--- In IBObjects@y..., "Jason Wharton" <jwharton@i...> wrote:
where the data has to be distinctive, and a couple of these tables
will grow by several thousand rows per year. There are quite a few
lookups and M-D setups involved. I should probably consider a way to
move the older data out to archive tables annually anyway!
program, with appropriate selection references changed. I should
probably give both ways a try and compare the speed.
Thanks again for your advice & time,
Cheers,
Steve
> How many groups will there be and how many records in the tables?There will probably only be two or three groups sharing 8 tables
where the data has to be distinctive, and a couple of these tables
will grow by several thousand rows per year. There are quite a few
lookups and M-D setups involved. I should probably consider a way to
move the older data out to archive tables annually anyway!
> I'm not so sure this situation is going to be all that ideal.on the
>
> I think it would be best to have the group figured out and stored
> client and used directly in the client app. Otherwise, you couldend up with
> some queries too difficult to properly optimize.I think you're suggesting to have two different versions of the
program, with appropriate selection references changed. I should
probably give both ways a try and compare the speed.
Thanks again for your advice & time,
Cheers,
Steve