Subject | Re: [IBO] Is TIBOTable Good? |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2001-03-13T15:32:01Z |
At 12:59 AM 14-03-01 +1000, you wrote:
Cheers,
Helen
All for Open and Open for All
InterBase Developer Initiative ยท http://www.interbase2000.org
_______________________________________________________
>Hello,The answer is that using table components as the general rule in client/server is NOT a good thing. That said, TIBOTable is just about as optimized as you can get. Jason has some further enhancements to it coming up in IBO 4 (now in beta).
>
>I am just wondering, is using TIBOTable completely (not bothering with
>IB_Query) a good thing / optimized?
>The reason is that I need the standard VCL controls for grids alike. Most ofWell, compatibility with the TDatasource-using controls is the common reason for using the TIBO* components. Why do you believe you need a table component for compatibility with the standard grid?
>the tasks are mainly data entry and search.
>Is IBOTable about the same level in terms of optimization to TIBDataSet?TIBOTable provides 99% emulation of TTable. There is just *no* comparison with TIBTable, which does not emulate TTable and is, as you said, for providing some sort of conversion support. Converson from TTable to TIBOTable is very straightforward - do carefully follow the procedure recommended in the IBO Help file - you won't have to change any code.
>I know TIBTable (from IBX) is very bad and just for conversion purpose.
Cheers,
Helen
All for Open and Open for All
InterBase Developer Initiative ยท http://www.interbase2000.org
_______________________________________________________