Subject | Re: [IBO] Is this a bug? (Master/Detail relations) |
---|---|
Author | Andreas Pohl |
Post date | 2001-10-23T19:00:11Z |
Petter,
I don't think so that this an IBO related problem. I often use same field names in different tables without any problems in master detail relationships.
Check your queries again and delete all wasted entries. In fact you only need 2 properties for a working m/d relationship: In detail query set MasterSource and MasterLinks. HTH
Mit freundlichem Gruss & Best Regards
Andreas Pohl
apohl@...
www.ibp-consult.com
I don't think so that this an IBO related problem. I often use same field names in different tables without any problems in master detail relationships.
Check your queries again and delete all wasted entries. In fact you only need 2 properties for a working m/d relationship: In detail query set MasterSource and MasterLinks. HTH
Mit freundlichem Gruss & Best Regards
Andreas Pohl
apohl@...
www.ibp-consult.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <petter.holmstrom@...>
To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:52 PM
Subject: [IBO] Is this a bug? (Master/Detail relations)
> Hello,
>
> Situation:
>
> I have two tables, dgroup and device. In a master/detail relationship
> the group table serves as the master and device as the detail. The
> masterlinks for the device table are: device.dgroup=dgroup.dposition.
> The problem is, that both dgroup and device contain the
> field 'changed'. The result of this is that IBO tries to link these
> tables together using the 'changed' field, resulting in numerous
> error messages. Is this a bug or am I missing something here?
>
> Thanks for any help, this is rather important...
>
> -Petter-
>