Subject | Re: [IBO] IB_Query Fields -- Accessing via default array and FieldByName accessor |
---|---|
Author | Eddie Bush |
Post date | 2001-01-25T00:21:42Z |
Ok, I aliased the fields that get updated. I still get the error:
'Field name: not found'
This is really starting to irk me. I see no reason for this. It happens
when the dataset is posted. Suggestions on things to look for?
Thanks,
Eddie
'Field name: not found'
This is really starting to irk me. I see no reason for this. It happens
when the dataset is posted. Suggestions on things to look for?
Thanks,
Eddie
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason Wharton <jwharton@...>
To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: [IBO] IB_Query Fields -- Accessing via default array and
FieldByName accessor
> The answer to your first question is no.
>
> My response to the second is to avoid having a blank field name by using
an
> alias name.
>
> HTH,
> Jason Wharton
> CPS - Mesa AZ
> http://www.ibobjects.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eddie Bush" <eddie@...>
> To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:13 PM
> Subject: [IBO] IB_Query Fields -- Accessing via default array and
> FieldByName accessor
>
>
> > If you use table names in the query, must you also use them when
accessing
> the query via the default array and when using the
> FieldByName('Field').AsType accessors?
> >
> > If my query is ...
> >
> > Select ATable.AField from ATable;
> >
> > Must I access AField by qryATable['AField'] or by
> qryATable['ATable.AField']. I notice that this is how they show up when
you
> want to set the field for a data-aware control, but I have had luck using
> the non-qualified field names in the past.
> >
> > Currently, I have a problem where, when I refresh my dataset, it claims
it
> cannot find a field -- the name of which is blank.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance!
> >
> > Eddie Bush
>
>
>
>
>