Subject | Re: [IBO] IB_Query Fields -- Accessing via default array and FieldByName accessor |
---|---|
Author | Jason Wharton |
Post date | 2001-01-24T21:49:22Z |
The answer to your first question is no.
My response to the second is to avoid having a blank field name by using an
alias name.
HTH,
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com
My response to the second is to avoid having a blank field name by using an
alias name.
HTH,
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eddie Bush" <eddie@...>
To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:13 PM
Subject: [IBO] IB_Query Fields -- Accessing via default array and
FieldByName accessor
> If you use table names in the query, must you also use them when accessing
the query via the default array and when using the
FieldByName('Field').AsType accessors?
>
> If my query is ...
>
> Select ATable.AField from ATable;
>
> Must I access AField by qryATable['AField'] or by
qryATable['ATable.AField']. I notice that this is how they show up when you
want to set the field for a data-aware control, but I have had luck using
the non-qualified field names in the past.
>
> Currently, I have a problem where, when I refresh my dataset, it claims it
cannot find a field -- the name of which is blank.
>
> Thanks in Advance!
>
> Eddie Bush