My dear friend!

I thought you were going to show us all up. Would you mind sharing the
progress you made to this point? If you do I will take if from there and see
if I can at least give you a method in IB_Schema.pas to call in order to
populate a listbox's items property.

Kind regards,
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com

----- Original Message -----
From: <Marcos.Nobre@...>
To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [IBO] Suggestions for New version the IBO 4.0


> I suggest a new IBO Class approach : each DataSet Field could
> contain a kind of TStringList property that revels me if exists the
> database field check constrains values.
>
> (Now talking to Jason) I tried to do this starting with SQL statement
> that brings me a resultset line with check constraint source code in one
> column. I stopped there.
>
> TIA,
>
> MNobre
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jason Wharton" <jwharton@...> em 29/11/2000 14:30:50
>
> Favor responder a IBObjects@egroups.com
>
> Para: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
> cc:
> Assunto: Re: [IBO] Suggestions for New version the IBO 4.0
>
>
> Yes, of course!
>
> Jason Wharton
> CPS - Mesa AZ
> http://www.ibobjects.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paulo Henrique Albanez" <pha@...>
> To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 2:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [IBO] Suggestions for New version the IBO 4.0
>
>
> > What is the future of IBO native controls ?
> >
> > Will it be enlarged and improved?
> >
> > PHA
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jason Wharton <jwharton@...>
> > To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 5:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: [IBO] Suggestions for New version the IBO 4.0
> >
> >
> > > I have investigated this possibility and it is too complex to support
> at
> > > this time. There are conflicting uses of limited mechanisms in each
> system
> > > of dataset usage. What one did would trample the other and visa-versa.
> It
> > > just isn't going to happen, at least not anytime soon.
> > >
> > > Believe me, I know the great benefit it would be but it just isn't
> > feasible.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jason Wharton
> > > CPS - Mesa AZ
> > > http://www.ibobjects.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Paulo Henrique Albanez" <pha@...>
> > > To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 12:41 PM
> > > Subject: [IBO] Suggestions for New version the IBO 4.0
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I've done a small test:
> > > >
> > > > I've atributed the Dataset property of the TIB_DataSource component
> the
> > > value of InternalDataset property of the TIBOQuery component, and it
> > worked
> > > reasonably.
> > > >
> > > > The biggest problem I've verified was in synchronous between
> TIB_Query
> > and
> > > TIBOQuery.
> > > >
> > > > Jason, I would like that you think of the possibility of developing
a
> > > TIBOQuery componet that could be compatible with VCL, but without
> losing
> > > TIB_Query's power, and that could also be accessed by the TIB_
> components,
> > > through internal TIB_Query that it owns, I believe that it would
> complete
> > > IBO even more, doesn't matter how much work it would take.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards!
> > > >
> > > > PHA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>