Subject | Re: Convert from ASA - rock solid enough? |
---|---|
Author | dancooperstock |
Post date | 2004-11-13T18:02:59Z |
Thanks Ann. Do you know of any users using it in a similar way to the
way I want to use it, namely as an embedded database, in an
application used by a lot of non-techie users, that I might be able
to use as a reference?
Where in the documentation might I read to better understand what the
exact difference is in functionality between the embedded and server
versions?
Thanks again.
--- In IB-Conversions@yahoogroups.com, "Ann W. Harrison"
<aharrison@i...> wrote:
way I want to use it, namely as an embedded database, in an
application used by a lot of non-techie users, that I might be able
to use as a reference?
Where in the documentation might I read to better understand what the
exact difference is in functionality between the embedded and server
versions?
Thanks again.
--- In IB-Conversions@yahoogroups.com, "Ann W. Harrison"
<aharrison@i...> wrote:
> That looks like a great application, and one for which Firebirdwould
> be well suited. For an application like Donation, you will find
> Firebird rock solid. It requires no more administration than ASA -
> just regular backups which can be scheduled programmatically. And,
> of course, all features of the system are available in the free
> edition, there being no other edition.
>
> >2) Is there any reason not to just use the embedded version of
> >Firebird, rather than a server version? Obviously, I'm running on
> >Windows. I want to keep the install program as small and
> >straightforward as possible.
>
> No reason.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Ann