Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Distributing/deploying Stored Procedures |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) |
Post date | 2015-03-12T07:05:48Z |
through the application to make certain changes the first time a new release is run (alter table etc) but am concerned at how I am supposed to update SPs (potentially a large number) without access to the FB server. I considered extracting the metadata(FlameRobin), deleting superfluous statements and pumping what is left through the app but that seems like A LOT of work.>I can pump SQL statements
Martijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
Download Database Workbench for Oracle, MS SQL Server, Sybase SQL
Anywhere, MySQL, InterBase, NexusDB and Firebird!
I’m a bit of a FB noob and am after some advice about Stored Procedures and the best way to distribute them to client sites.
We are in the process of redeveloping our software using FB as the back end (it was previously ISAM). We have a reasonably large client base and our application is installed on many sites which run independently.
We intend to make use of Stored Procedures, Triggers etc and between releases (during development) these objects will be created, dropped, modified etc. I have been tasked with finding a solution to distribute the update/upgrade SP.
At the client end they will access the data via our application (via ODBC). They will have no direct access to the FB server and no ISQL command.
I can pump SQL statements through the application to make certain changes the first time a new release is run (alter table etc) but am concerned at how I am supposed to update SPs (potentially a large number) without access to the FB server. I considered extracting the metadata(FlameRobin), deleting superfluous statements and pumping what is left through the app but that seems like A LOT of work.
Also, do I bother with ‘alter procedure …..’ or do I simply drop them and (re)create them (after all, at release time, the SP is the SP)
I am trying to automate the task as much as possible, I don’t want our support staff to have to intervene in an upgrade.
Surely I’m not the only one that has needed to do such a thing. Does such a mechanism exist? Perhaps some suitable suggestions?