Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Bad performance of Firebird in Windows Server 2012 |
---|---|
Author | Carlos H. Cantu |
Post date | 2015-12-24T17:50:03Z |
The other is the fact that PDC machine will always have write cache disabled.
Carlos
www.firebirdnews.org - www.FireBase.com.br
Carlos: Thank you for your answer. I suggested to not configure the server as a domain controller but the person who decide this didn´t want! I already read the article you mention and there is where I found that apparently upgrading to 2.1.5 will solve the problem but I was not sure. So if I upgrade, the performance would be similar as if disk cache was enabled? I don´t understand what do you mean saying "The cache problem you are referring to is another thing". Are there TWO cache problems? Which is THE OTHER? Please, can you explain me? Regards Eduardo -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: Re: [firebird-support] Bad performance of Firebird in Windows Server 2012 De: 'Carlos H. Cantu' listas@... [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> Para: Eduardo gusedum@... [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> Fecha: 24/12/2015 12:47 Never use Firebird (or any RDBMS) in a PDC machine! Windows will always disable write disk cache in PDC, and it will be very bad for any write sensitive application, like databases (not only Firebird). The cache problem you are referring to is another thing, and to solve this one, you need to upgrade to 2.1.5 (at last): http://dyemanov.blogspot.com.br/2012/03/firebird-vs-windows-file-system-caching.html Carlos www.firebirdnews.org - www.FireBase.com.br
|