Subject | Re: [firebird-support] There are risks accessing a database with two servers? |
---|---|
Author | Leonardo Carneiro |
Post date | 2013-04-26T13:51:09Z |
I'm pretty sure that what the article means (although not clearly
especified), is that you should have two firebird instances with 2
separated databases.
These databases should be replicated from one (OLTP) to another (OLAP) in
any way you think is best for your case.
especified), is that you should have two firebird instances with 2
separated databases.
These databases should be replicated from one (OLTP) to another (OLAP) in
any way you think is best for your case.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Jesus Garcia <jegaza@...> wrote:
>
> > it seems possible and desirable to have 2 Servers, one for long running
> > reports (probably using Classic) and another for the other tasks (using
> > SuperServer)
> >
> > Is that right?
> >
>
> Classic server can't open a database opened by superserver, because SS
> opens it exclusive mode.
>
> May be the article refer to two classic servers accessing the same db.
>
> Jesús
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
> on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
> Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]