Subject | Scaling up Firebird-2.5.2.26539_0_x64.exe |
---|---|
Author | red_october2009 |
Post date | 2013-02-06T23:18:49Z |
I came across this document:
http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/documentation/papers_presentations/html/paper-fbent-impacting.html
It seems to be talking about a much older version of FB than is available now. Even back in the days of Win 2003 Server, I've built systems that had probably 300 concurrent users without performance degradation.
I intend to connect about 2000 concurrent users. Is the subject FB version capable on say, 16GB ram, assuming I have a very simple and efficient table structure, queries, plans, FKs and PKs?
If FB cannot handle this number of concurrent connections, what DB should I move to? MS SQL or Oracle? or something else?
http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/documentation/papers_presentations/html/paper-fbent-impacting.html
It seems to be talking about a much older version of FB than is available now. Even back in the days of Win 2003 Server, I've built systems that had probably 300 concurrent users without performance degradation.
I intend to connect about 2000 concurrent users. Is the subject FB version capable on say, 16GB ram, assuming I have a very simple and efficient table structure, queries, plans, FKs and PKs?
If FB cannot handle this number of concurrent connections, what DB should I move to? MS SQL or Oracle? or something else?