Hello everybody, I have a question:

- Transaction 510 inserts a row
- Transaction 510 commit
- Transaction 526 start
- Transaction 526 updates the row inserted by transaction 510
- Transaction 535 start
- Transaction 535 updates the row inserted by transaction 510
- Transaction 542 start
- Transaction 542 updates the row inserted by transaction 510

1. Should be the order for the following commits: 526, 535, 542?

2. Or in some cases it could be 542, 535, 526?

If the answer is 1. it means that if transaction 526 hangs up will avoid
transactions 535 and 542 to finish. Am I right?

Greetings.

Walter.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]