>
>
> Okay, great! :) Unlike you, I don't speak from experience - I was
> referring to Ann Harrison's comment in the mail I linked to:
>
> What this history means is that the engine is inherently
> capable of handling concurrent transactions in a connection
> but *there is no way to use them* [my emphasis, ML] and the
> interface layers that surround the engine don't support the
> capability. The requirement for multiple transactions per
> connection came when a connection was very heavy-weight
> relative to a transaction. I'm not convinced that's the
> case now.
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/message/118391
>
>

In this case I'm glad to be proved wrong by interface designers.

Cheers,

Ann


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]