| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Is windows better than Linux for Firebird 2.5 64 bit? |
|---|---|
| Author | Dmitry Kuzmenko |
| Post date | 2012-11-08T06:25:58Z |
Hello, trskopo!
Wednesday, November 7, 2012, 9:29:05 AM, you wrote:
t> 1) What drivers in that should exist for better performance? My
t> guest is CPU and Harddisk, is this correct?
yes. But even you buy brand hardware, drivers can be bad in
performance.
t> 2) Assuming that Linux and windows has correct drivers, which one is better?
It can be understood only by test. Linux is much specific, as I said.
For example, on some hardware Linux (CentOS) was 30% slower than
Windows (for FB Classic with ~400 active connections).
I do not use Linux :-) but our clients - use latest CentOS and Suse.
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, www.ib-aid.com
Wednesday, November 7, 2012, 9:29:05 AM, you wrote:
t> 1) What drivers in that should exist for better performance? My
t> guest is CPU and Harddisk, is this correct?
yes. But even you buy brand hardware, drivers can be bad in
performance.
t> 2) Assuming that Linux and windows has correct drivers, which one is better?
It can be understood only by test. Linux is much specific, as I said.
For example, on some hardware Linux (CentOS) was 30% slower than
Windows (for FB Classic with ~400 active connections).
>> 2. You can choose linux distro by your preferrence. If you don't knowt> I am thinking using CentOS or Suse, what distro do you use for yours?
>> any Linux well, then, you will have troubles.
>>
I do not use Linux :-) but our clients - use latest CentOS and Suse.
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, www.ib-aid.com