Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird og Win/2008R2 |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2012-01-28T00:51:41Z |
Em 27/1/2012 20:32, Aage Johansen escreveu:
insert/update/delete perhaps the shared cache of SS could be a good
beneffit, but I think that the OS cache could do the same job...
A natural choice for SMP machine is CS ou SC...
I would choose SC ou CS instead of SS even if the most use is select's
see you !
> A friend is about to buy a new server, and he has been offered aMy experience is with OLTP use, once you said that there is few
> Fujitsu TX300S6 with Windows Server 2008 R2.
> The offered server has 16GB RAM, and will use RAID-1 or RAID-10
> (controller has 512MB cache) with 15krpm SAS disks. Xeon E5620 (quad
> core) with 12MB cache.
> The old server has two 2GHz Xeon processors with 512KB cache (nearly
> 8 years old), and runs Win2k (Pro, I believe) with Firebird 1.5 SuperServer.
>
> If we choose to run Firebird 2.5 64bit I assume SuperClassic would be
> a natural choice. Or SuperServer still?
> The databases are 1GB and 8GB (light use, mostly blobs with jpg
> pictures). 20-ish users (probably about 10 concurrent
> users). Sometimes intensive use, but that is almost all
> select. Insert/update/delete are seldom done in batch mode.
>
> What should I choose, what can I expect (of interesting
> things). Anything in particular to look out for?
>
>
> TiA
> Aage J.
>
>
insert/update/delete perhaps the shared cache of SS could be a good
beneffit, but I think that the OS cache could do the same job...
A natural choice for SMP machine is CS ou SC...
I would choose SC ou CS instead of SS even if the most use is select's
see you !