Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Migrating from MySQL to Firebird |
---|---|
Author | Milan Babuskov |
Post date | 2012-01-20T11:03:07Z |
Go Green wrote:
is running.
I can't tell about InnoDB, as I never used it myself. The only two
reasons I still use MySQL on some projects are:
1. speed
2. availability of transaction-less storage (MyISAM) which saves you
from having to backup/restore periodically to reset transaction counters
Note that 1. and 2. are related, MyISAM is much faster than Firebird
just because it has no transaction overhead.
--
Milan Babuskov
==================================
The easiest way to import XML, CSV
and textual files into Firebird:
http://www.guacosoft.com/xmlwizard
==================================
> I have never used firebird and therefore wanted to know how it fits when compared to MySQL in terms of:If you use MyISAM, then the answers are:
> ANSI SQL complianceFirebird is much better.
> TriggersFirebird is much better.
> Foreign KeysFirebird is much better.
> Stored ProceduresFirebird is much better.
> High AvailabilityFirebird is much better, for example, you can do hot-backup while system
is running.
I can't tell about InnoDB, as I never used it myself. The only two
reasons I still use MySQL on some projects are:
1. speed
2. availability of transaction-less storage (MyISAM) which saves you
from having to backup/restore periodically to reset transaction counters
Note that 1. and 2. are related, MyISAM is much faster than Firebird
just because it has no transaction overhead.
--
Milan Babuskov
==================================
The easiest way to import XML, CSV
and textual files into Firebird:
http://www.guacosoft.com/xmlwizard
==================================