Subject RE: [firebird-support] Re: FB database in RAM
Author Leyne, Sean

> Your setup sounds like it would benefit from a couple - active and archive.
> You'd create the files for the active tables on read-write media while the
> archive stuff would be created as read-write, but run off the SSDs in read-
> only mode.

You get the same effect from the "SSD Cache" features present on some (a growing number) of disk controllers.

By teaming a SSD with an HDD (or array) you would essentially have an entire database in the SSD for read-only operations while having the safety of HDD storage.

So, let's leave it to hardware to solve this problem, and keep Firebird out of it.