Subject | Re: [firebird-support] classic vs super classic? |
---|---|
Author | Milan Babuskov |
Post date | 2011-06-06T14:02:49Z |
heineferreira wrote:
It uses less memory than classic.
databases each accessed by low number of clients.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://www.CountdownGames.tv
> How much does the memory usage differ between classic and super classic?SuperClassic is like having a superserver for each database separately.
It uses less memory than classic.
> It looks like super classic is a better option for smp.No, it's the other way around. SC would be better only if you have many
databases each accessed by low number of clients.
> can you develop on super server and then deploy to super classic?Yes.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://www.CountdownGames.tv