Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Some feedback of my 2.5 experience |
---|---|
Author | Norman Dunbar |
Post date | 2011-06-04T16:26:26Z |
Hi Ann,
a PK on the ID column. As we weren't told that this is the case, best
not to assume. ;-)
However, I didn't spot the zero on the end of the gen_id() function
call. My bad. I read it as a digit one for some reason - possibly
because that was what I expected to read. (And I wasn't the only one!)
<SNIP>
didn't want to cast aspersions on it's good name! Not without hard
evidence first. In my day job, it's almsot always the application
causing trouble, not the database. About 99.9% of my "database" troubles
are in fact application troubles.
Cheers,
Norm.
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered address:
Thorpe House
61 Richardshaw Lane
Pudsey
West Yorkshire
United Kingdom
LS28 7EL
Company Number: 05132767
>>>> IF (NEW.ID IS NULL) THENWell, that's obviously true, *assuming* that the table was defined with
>>>> NEW.ID = GEN_ID(GEN_CUSTOMERINCIDENTS_ID,0);
>>>>
> ...
>>
>> 1. There will be an ID present when the record is INSERTed.
>
> That may be true, but the primary key index will reject a null primary key, so
> a record with no ID will never be inserted.
a PK on the ID column. As we weren't told that this is the case, best
not to assume. ;-)
However, I didn't spot the zero on the end of the gen_id() function
call. My bad. I read it as a digit one for some reason - possibly
because that was what I expected to read. (And I wasn't the only one!)
>> 2. The ID will be "in sequence" with the application, so no chance of aAgreed. As I mentioned, I missed the zero!
>> duplicate ID being used.
>
> That depends entirely on how keys are generated in the normal case. Unless
> they always use the same generator, that trigger could easily create duplicates.
<SNIP>
>> I would assume this to be the case. But as you said earlier, you are onAgain, true. However, I'm not using and abusing 2.5 much yet, so I
>> 2.5 and there are a couple of "complaints" about 2.5 on this list at the
>> moment. If there is a 2.5 problem, maybe you are hitting it.
>
> It may be a 2.5 issue, or it may be a huge number of unsuccessful retries.
didn't want to cast aspersions on it's good name! Not without hard
evidence first. In my day job, it's almsot always the application
causing trouble, not the database. About 99.9% of my "database" troubles
are in fact application troubles.
Cheers,
Norm.
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered address:
Thorpe House
61 Richardshaw Lane
Pudsey
West Yorkshire
United Kingdom
LS28 7EL
Company Number: 05132767