Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird 2.5 SuperClassic on Linux 64 -OS memory allocation problem |
---|---|
Author | Anderson Farias |
Post date | 2011-02-24T18:24:59Z |
OK, got it!
Thanks Philippe!
=)
--- Em qui, 24/2/11, Philippe Makowski <makowski@...> escreveu:
De: Philippe Makowski <makowski@...>
Assunto: Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird 2.5 SuperClassic on Linux 64 -OS memory allocation problem
Para: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Data: Quinta-feira, 24 de Fevereiro de 2011, 13:26
2011/2/24 Anderson Farias <peixedragao@...>
Firebird 2.1 and Centos 5 is a good choice (the tracker for example is
Centos 5 and Firebird 2.1)
and Centos 5 have Firebird 2.1 in EPEL repository
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thanks Philippe!
=)
--- Em qui, 24/2/11, Philippe Makowski <makowski@...> escreveu:
De: Philippe Makowski <makowski@...>
Assunto: Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird 2.5 SuperClassic on Linux 64 -OS memory allocation problem
Para: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Data: Quinta-feira, 24 de Fevereiro de 2011, 13:26
2011/2/24 Anderson Farias <peixedragao@...>
>because Centos 5 have glibc < 2.7
> |Centos 5 is not a good plateform for Firebird 2.5 Classic or SuperClassic
>
> And why is that?
> Does this statement also applies to FB 2.1?no, absolutely not
Firebird 2.1 and Centos 5 is a good choice (the tracker for example is
Centos 5 and Firebird 2.1)
and Centos 5 have Firebird 2.1 in EPEL repository
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]