Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Re: Best raid configuration - Email found in subject |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2011-12-27T18:49:54Z |
Stephane,
http://pcguide.com/ref/hdd/perf/raid/levels/comp-c.html
For a production server, RAID 0 is NEVER EVER EVER recommended. It had no fault tolerance; if 1 drive fails, you lose all your data!
Depending on read/write ratio of your application (if many more reads than writes), and the quality of your RAID controller RAID 5 does not perform as badly as the chart suggests (I would expect that the chart assumes only a basic RAID controllers with no BBU cache).
RAID 5 gives you the most available storage
RAID 1/10 gives you that fastest random write performance.
Sean
> i not understand, it's write that raid 10 is recommended ! ??The RAID levels and their relative performance trade-offs can be seen on the following link:
http://pcguide.com/ref/hdd/perf/raid/levels/comp-c.html
For a production server, RAID 0 is NEVER EVER EVER recommended. It had no fault tolerance; if 1 drive fails, you lose all your data!
Depending on read/write ratio of your application (if many more reads than writes), and the quality of your RAID controller RAID 5 does not perform as badly as the chart suggests (I would expect that the chart assumes only a basic RAID controllers with no BBU cache).
RAID 5 gives you the most available storage
RAID 1/10 gives you that fastest random write performance.
Sean