| Subject | Re: Does Firebird expose the db wide 'row version'? |
|---|---|
| Author | samcarleton |
| Post date | 2011-10-10T02:14:56Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "fernnaj" <yo@...> wrote:
That is EXACTLY the situation I am predicting. In the post you stated "Finally I opted to implement #2, as Firebird does have the same concept", can you give me a bit more info on how to do it in Firebird?
It will be perfect for the project I am just starting and maybe, just maybe Interbase 7.5.1 will have that feature, too, thought I am not holding my breath.
Sam
>Fernando,
> Hello,
>
> I had the same question time ago, and I posted at MS Forums - please have a look at my post at http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/syncdevdiscussions/thread/102fd11e-d7ce-479e-a07b-b2e836f3f87e - at the end min_active_rowversion is what we use.
That is EXACTLY the situation I am predicting. In the post you stated "Finally I opted to implement #2, as Firebird does have the same concept", can you give me a bit more info on how to do it in Firebird?
It will be perfect for the project I am just starting and maybe, just maybe Interbase 7.5.1 will have that feature, too, thought I am not holding my breath.
Sam