Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB. |
---|---|
Author | Sudheer Palaparambil |
Post date | 2011-10-10T01:58:08Z |
Hi Friends,
Pls have a look at the open source project
http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using this
for the last 2 years
with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync both ways, HO
to branch as well as branch to HO.
Regards.
Sudheer Palaprambil.
Pls have a look at the open source project
http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using this
for the last 2 years
with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync both ways, HO
to branch as well as branch to HO.
Regards.
Sudheer Palaprambil.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Aage Johansen <aagjohan@...> wrote:
> **
>
>
> Sam wrote:
> <<
> ...
>
> Take a look at the Synchronization Example at the bottom of this
> link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sync/bb821992 It explains the
> basic concept of how Sync Framework syncs the data. The whole key to
> it is the "Update Tick Count" which is database wide. In the
> Microsoft world is the @@DBTS function. They refer to this function
> as either the timestamp or as the rowversion.
> ...
> >>
>
> When I read about maintaining "tombstone information" (for deleted
> items) I thought that replication - while not a simple solution -
> might eventually be a better choice. YMMV.
>
> A point to note is that InterBase and Firebird may be talking a lot
> on the wire (at least they used to) meaning that they might not be
> the very quickest performers over the internet. Again, YMMV.
>
> --
> Aage J.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]