Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Commit vs Commit Retaining |
---|---|
Author | Ricardo Uzcategui |
Post date | 2010-07-29T13:28Z |
Yes. The CommitRetaining keep out of my code since 1999. i have corrupt
database because i was ised commit retaining... i never used again...
2010/7/29 Doug Chamberlin <dougchamberlin@...>
Ricardo...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
database because i was ised commit retaining... i never used again...
2010/7/29 Doug Chamberlin <dougchamberlin@...>
>--
>
> On 7/29/2010 7:27 AM, Walter wrote:
> > Hi, i'm using Firebird 2.1 with Delphi 5 and FreeIBComponents. I was used
> to perform a CommitRetaining to commit transactions but recently I found on
> internet that this metod is unsafe because it stops or affects garbage
> collection (some people saying that CommitRetaining should never used).
> Which is the right way to follow ?
> >
>
> What was your reason for retaining the active transaction before? If you
> had no good reason, then you should have just used a regular commit.
> That would be the generally "right" thing to do.
>
> --
> Doug C.
> -----
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
>
>
Ricardo...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]