Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Commit vs Commit Retaining |
---|---|
Author | Doug Chamberlin |
Post date | 2010-07-29T11:57:17Z |
On 7/29/2010 7:27 AM, Walter wrote:
had no good reason, then you should have just used a regular commit.
That would be the generally "right" thing to do.
--
Doug C.
-----
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> Hi, i'm using Firebird 2.1 with Delphi 5 and FreeIBComponents. I was used to perform a CommitRetaining to commit transactions but recently I found on internet that this metod is unsafe because it stops or affects garbage collection (some people saying that CommitRetaining should never used). Which is the right way to follow ?What was your reason for retaining the active transaction before? If you
>
had no good reason, then you should have just used a regular commit.
That would be the generally "right" thing to do.
--
Doug C.
-----
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?