Subject Re: Fb_inet_server.exe consumes a lot of ram
Author hantrolden
Hi All

Thanks for your help. I have found the error. It was the Page_Buffer on database level (not server level) which caused the problem.

I could see that when I changed DefaultDBCachePages it had no effect on the settings I could see when doing a GSTAT -h.

By changing the buffer size from 10000 to 0 (GFIX -buffer 0) it solved the problem.

Thanks for your help

Regards
Kenneth


--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Ismael L. Donis GarcĂ­a" <ismael@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.firebirdsql.org/download/snapshot_builds/win/2.1/
>
> Regards
> =========
> || ISMAEL ||
> =========
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: hantrolden
> To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:52 PM
> Subject: [firebird-support] Re: Fb_inet_server.exe consumes a lot of ram
>
>
>
> Hi Alan
>
> I will have our developers to look at that. But the strange thing is that the same application is running on many other customers - without this problem. Why can it be that on only 1 customer the RAM behaviour differs that much. The other customers are alo using Firebird 2.1.3 and appaerently a client with no Charset.
>
> This leads me to that I don't think it is the charset. Any comments on this?
>
> I can't fint a link to Firebird 2.1.4. Is it necessary to request that version directly?
>
> Kenneth
>
> --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Alan McDonald" <alan@> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alan
> > >
> > > How can I check the Charset. Is by extracting Metadata or is there an
> > > easy way (command tools) to check and change the Charset in the
> > > database?
> > >
> > > Kennneth
> > >
> >
> > I'm not talking about the charset of the database. I'm talking about the
> > charset declard by the connecting applications as part of their connection
> > string.
> > The database can be NONE, albeir many parts are not NONE (fields or
> > tables..)
> > But the connections must be made with a charset other than NONE
> > Alan
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>