| Subject | Re: FB2.1 - Which one give best performance ? |
|---|---|
| Author | roar4711 |
| Post date | 2009-04-13T11:41:50Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, elangmas@... wrote:
All Windows server OS have a different default priority to "forground" and "background" tasks than a Workstation OS (like XP), in the server case background tasks like services are given more priority from the process scheduler.
But overall performance difference is likely to be neglible if all three alternatives is running on the same hardware, at least in my own experience.
>Windows 2003 is the most suitable OS for running a database on.
> Hi,
>
> Currently I am running FB2.1 on WinXP Pro
>
> Which one is the fastest or will give the best performance whether
> FB2.1 is installed in
> Win2K Server, Win2k3 Server or WinXP Pro (existing) ??
>
> I need your comments or suggestion.
>
> Thanks
>
All Windows server OS have a different default priority to "forground" and "background" tasks than a Workstation OS (like XP), in the server case background tasks like services are given more priority from the process scheduler.
But overall performance difference is likely to be neglible if all three alternatives is running on the same hardware, at least in my own experience.