Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Embedded much faster than SS? |
---|---|
Author | Carlos H. Cantu |
Post date | 2009-03-09T14:03:37Z |
Did you test with SS connected using local protocol (XNET)?
Carlos
Firebird Performance in Detail - http://videos.firebirddevelopersday.com
www.firebirdnews.org - www.FireBase.com.br
GB> Hi,
GB> I am working on an application which convert some text files into a
GB> Firebird database. In standard case I using SS. I want more speed for my
GB> application and tried with embedded, and wait for 1,2 max 5 percent
GB> performance increase. But the application 30 percent faster with
GB> embedded. Is this normal? I tried with FB 2.1.1(and with 2.1.2 RC2 too)
GB> SS/Embedded on Win XP SP3.
GB> Gabor
Carlos
Firebird Performance in Detail - http://videos.firebirddevelopersday.com
www.firebirdnews.org - www.FireBase.com.br
GB> Hi,
GB> I am working on an application which convert some text files into a
GB> Firebird database. In standard case I using SS. I want more speed for my
GB> application and tried with embedded, and wait for 1,2 max 5 percent
GB> performance increase. But the application 30 percent faster with
GB> embedded. Is this normal? I tried with FB 2.1.1(and with 2.1.2 RC2 too)
GB> SS/Embedded on Win XP SP3.
GB> Gabor