Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Classic vs SS |
---|---|
Author | Hannes Streicher |
Post date | 2009-12-02T16:18:45Z |
Good evening all
Superserver performs better on disk intensive uses because it can use
a larger cache
Classic is better for cpu intensive usage
--
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen
Hannes Streicher mailto:HStreicher@...
>> Whereas Classic would start on FBServer per connection and that this wasi would say
>> more efficient on both linus and windows.
> I don't have numbers for Linux, but on Windows SMP boxes changing from SS to
> Classic was a *HUGE* difference (Classic performs a *lot* better) ... Than,
> I've been using Classic for all SMP boxes, Win or Linux.
Superserver performs better on disk intensive uses because it can use
a larger cache
Classic is better for cpu intensive usage
--
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen
Hannes Streicher mailto:HStreicher@...