Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Keeping database file in OS cache |
---|---|
Author | Mercea Paul |
Post date | 2008-09-30T07:43:27Z |
Hi
Take a look in firebird.conf to DefaultDbCachePages, MaxFileSystemCache,
TempBlockSize, TempCacheLimit, MaxUnflushedWrites.maybe help!
Regards,
Paul
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of diwic2
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 09:38
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [firebird-support] Keeping database file in OS cache
Hello.
We're running Firebird 2.1 on Windows, and we've come to the non-
surprising conclusion that our SQL questions go much faster if the
database file has entered Windows' system cache.
We need a fast answer, so the question is then; how do we get it into
the cache, and how do we keep it there?
We had an idea about sending random SQL questions (that are similar to
the real questions sent) - first a massive amount when the computer
boots up, then at regular intervals if the database is idle.
Is there a smarter way to accomplish the same thing?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Take a look in firebird.conf to DefaultDbCachePages, MaxFileSystemCache,
TempBlockSize, TempCacheLimit, MaxUnflushedWrites.maybe help!
Regards,
Paul
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of diwic2
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 09:38
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [firebird-support] Keeping database file in OS cache
Hello.
We're running Firebird 2.1 on Windows, and we've come to the non-
surprising conclusion that our SQL questions go much faster if the
database file has entered Windows' system cache.
We need a fast answer, so the question is then; how do we get it into
the cache, and how do we keep it there?
We had an idea about sending random SQL questions (that are similar to
the real questions sent) - first a massive amount when the computer
boots up, then at regular intervals if the database is idle.
Is there a smarter way to accomplish the same thing?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]