| Subject | Firebird Service Name |
|---|---|
| Author | Robert |
| Post date | 2008-08-06T13:06:20Z |
I'm writing a Windows service that is dependent on the Firebird service.
Is it valid to hard code "FirebirdServerDefaultInstance" as the
Firebird service name, or should I be deriving the name somehow to
ensure future (and perhaps backwards) compatability?
Regards,
Robert.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1595 - Release Date: 06/08/2008 08:23
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1595 - Release Date: 06/08/2008 08:23
Is it valid to hard code "FirebirdServerDefaultInstance" as the
Firebird service name, or should I be deriving the name somehow to
ensure future (and perhaps backwards) compatability?
Regards,
Robert.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1595 - Release Date: 06/08/2008 08:23
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1595 - Release Date: 06/08/2008 08:23