| Subject | Newest Version Firebird upgrading | 
|---|---|
| Author | Olaf Kluge | 
| Post date | 2008-07-24T10:28:35Z | 
Hello.
 
 
In advance, thank you for your help!
 
I have two systems. One firebird 1.5 superserver, one firebird 2.0.3 classic
server.
 
Now I will update both systems to the newest firebird 2.1-Version in classic
server. I have learned, that in classic server I must change the
db-pages-value in the firebird.conf.
 
For both systems a Microsoft access-frontend has access to the
firebird-server and I am using UDAs.
 
The second system is my problematic case. Now I have changed the
firebird.conf, but the database will be bigger and bigger. The gstat-h shows
me, that the difference between oldest and next transaction is not more high
like few days ago. After compressing database, it works fine again.
 
Now I will update these both systems. Do you know Problems with both current
Versions by upgrading to the newest? In the firebird-upgrade-manual are
described many cases, perhaps you can me a short info for upgrading?
 
Thank you very much.
 
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            In advance, thank you for your help!
I have two systems. One firebird 1.5 superserver, one firebird 2.0.3 classic
server.
Now I will update both systems to the newest firebird 2.1-Version in classic
server. I have learned, that in classic server I must change the
db-pages-value in the firebird.conf.
For both systems a Microsoft access-frontend has access to the
firebird-server and I am using UDAs.
The second system is my problematic case. Now I have changed the
firebird.conf, but the database will be bigger and bigger. The gstat-h shows
me, that the difference between oldest and next transaction is not more high
like few days ago. After compressing database, it works fine again.
Now I will update these both systems. Do you know Problems with both current
Versions by upgrading to the newest? In the firebird-upgrade-manual are
described many cases, perhaps you can me a short info for upgrading?
Thank you very much.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]