Subject | Re: GBAK Backup Size |
---|---|
Author | Jason Chapman |
Post date | 2008-07-16T23:28:47Z |
<Andrew.Stuart@...> wrote:
database actually has secondary files, does it?
As a GBK is just meta data and then the data streamed, and a FDB has
additional space requirements for indices and the fact that records
don't 100% fill the page space, DB's are bigger than backups.
JAC.
>This implies no indices and 100% page fill to have same size DB and GBK.
> Hi
> I've noticed one has a GDB file size of 1.5gig, and GBK produced is ~
> 1.5GB
> Another has a CABS FDB of 1.5Gig and produces a FBU of around 3.5GBOK, now that isn't right. Only thing I can think of is that the
database actually has secondary files, does it?
As a GBK is just meta data and then the data streamed, and a FDB has
additional space requirements for indices and the fact that records
don't 100% fill the page space, DB's are bigger than backups.
JAC.