Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 2.1 and RemoteBindAddress broken? |
---|---|
Author | Björn Reimer |
Post date | 2008-05-05T13:29:39Z |
Hi Milan,
thank you for your answer.
The difference was in xinetd.conf.
I've just forgotten that I've made a change in the 2.0 one and when
trying to get the same result working on another machine with 2.1 I
only stepped over the entry in firebird.conf.
am Montag, 5. Mai 2008 um 09:52 schrieben Sie:
--
Björn Reimer, Datenbanken und DV-Verfahren
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Regionales RechenZentrum Erlangen (RRZE)
Martensstraße 1, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
Tel. +49 9131 85-29954, Fax +49 9131 302941
bjoern.reimer@...-erlangen.de
http://www.rrze.uni-erlangen.de/infrastruktur/datenbanken/
thank you for your answer.
The difference was in xinetd.conf.
I've just forgotten that I've made a change in the 2.0 one and when
trying to get the same result working on another machine with 2.1 I
only stepped over the entry in firebird.conf.
am Montag, 5. Mai 2008 um 09:52 schrieben Sie:
> Björn Reimer wrote:Björn
>>>> can anybody confirm, that the RemoteBindAddress config setting
>>>> in Classic Server 2.1 (64 bit linux) does not work?
>>
>>> AFAIK, that setting is not used when you use (x)inted and you should
>>> really configure inetd or xinetd.
>>
>> But why does it work on 2.0 then?
> Are 2.1 and 2.0 installed on the same machine? My guess is that you have
> two computers xinetd is configured differently.
--
Björn Reimer, Datenbanken und DV-Verfahren
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Regionales RechenZentrum Erlangen (RRZE)
Martensstraße 1, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
Tel. +49 9131 85-29954, Fax +49 9131 302941
bjoern.reimer@...-erlangen.de
http://www.rrze.uni-erlangen.de/infrastruktur/datenbanken/