Subject | Firebird and ODBC |
---|---|
Author | Michael Vilhelmsen |
Post date | 2008-02-05T09:32:43Z |
Hi
I have a problem when using ODBC driver.
Basicly I dont think its a FB problem, but I want to be sure.
DB: Firebird 1.5.4 running on a Windows 2003
ODBC: Version 1.x Beta, Most Recent
6 Jun 2006 (Beta V1.03.00.0096)
In the ODBC windows in the administrative tools I have set up a Systen
DSN.
Its connecting through the internet.
When "TEST CONENCTION" is done its connection fine.
But the program that uses the connection gives me this error in the
LOG file:
Error in GetLanguages: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException
(0x80004005): Dynamic SQL Error
SQL error code = -104
Token unknown - line 1, char 13
[
at ADODB.RecordsetClass.Open(Object Source, Object
ActiveConnection, CursorTypeEnum CursorType, LockTypeEnum LockType,
Int32 Options)
at DWIWindowsService.DwiWindowsService.GetLanguage()
Among others.
As I read this, and as I have seen with i.e. MS SQL it looks like the
SQL is:
Select xx from [TABLE] ....
And that the [ is not reconised by FB.
Is this correct ?
Michael
I have a problem when using ODBC driver.
Basicly I dont think its a FB problem, but I want to be sure.
DB: Firebird 1.5.4 running on a Windows 2003
ODBC: Version 1.x Beta, Most Recent
6 Jun 2006 (Beta V1.03.00.0096)
In the ODBC windows in the administrative tools I have set up a Systen
DSN.
Its connecting through the internet.
When "TEST CONENCTION" is done its connection fine.
But the program that uses the connection gives me this error in the
LOG file:
Error in GetLanguages: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException
(0x80004005): Dynamic SQL Error
SQL error code = -104
Token unknown - line 1, char 13
[
at ADODB.RecordsetClass.Open(Object Source, Object
ActiveConnection, CursorTypeEnum CursorType, LockTypeEnum LockType,
Int32 Options)
at DWIWindowsService.DwiWindowsService.GetLanguage()
Among others.
As I read this, and as I have seen with i.e. MS SQL it looks like the
SQL is:
Select xx from [TABLE] ....
And that the [ is not reconised by FB.
Is this correct ?
Michael