Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Best Server hardware to Firebird |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2008-12-11T21:52:52Z |
Rodrigo Aparecido Cardoso wrote:
entries are out.
Instead of doing a full gbak hourly, why don't you use NBACKUP
incremental back-up facilities.
1.) Full back-up weekly
2.) Incremental level 1 daily
3.) Incremental level 2 hourly
show me the output of gstat -h
use a single core)
Make sure you have a small page cache using CS.
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br
> Rodrigo,So the problem with garbage collection with long chains of duplicate
>
> What version ? (1.0.x, 1.5.x, 2.0.x, 2.1.x)
> 2.0.4
>
entries are out.
Instead of doing a full gbak hourly, why don't you use NBACKUP
incremental back-up facilities.
1.) Full back-up weekly
2.) Incremental level 1 daily
3.) Incremental level 2 hourly
> 1.) What is the size of the database ?small
> About 1.3 GB.
>
> I forgot to say, in this server runs IBreplicator, acessing 8 more BD'sDon't know what IBReplicator does that could impact on performance...
> each 5 minutes.
>
>let me see if it's not bad :)
> 2.) What is the database statistics during the day (right before the
> gbak process starts at 14pm for example)
> It's not bad, but I wanted improved the performance.
>
show me the output of gstat -h
>I suggest you to use CS version, IIRC you told us you use SS (SS would
> Server Information:
>
> PC:
>
> Core 2 Quad Q6600 2,4 Ghz
> 3 GB RAM
> HD 500 GB MAXTOR STM3500(7500 RPM)
>
> SO: Windows XP SP3
> Filepage 2046MB
>
use a single core)
Make sure you have a small page cache using CS.
>see you !
>
>
> We use de Firebird pagesize default,
>
>
> only changing these configurations can we have a better performance?
>
> Thank you very much,
>
>
>
> Rodrigo Cardoso
>
>
>
> P.S: I subscrible brazilian lists...
>
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br