Subject | How lightweight are superserver and classic? |
---|---|
Author | judlian23 |
Post date | 2008-10-09T01:06:58Z |
Hi all,
I'm looking to evaluate firebird. I am requiring a really lightweight
database (running hopefully under 200MB, not including the cache in
main memory).
I noticed that superserver can take advantage of my dualcore whereas
class cannot. From the term "superserver" I assume that it is not a
lightweight database.
Can you guys confirm/deny this? What are some typical memory
footprints of each one (an actual number and units would be helpful).
Thanks in advance.
Julian
I'm looking to evaluate firebird. I am requiring a really lightweight
database (running hopefully under 200MB, not including the cache in
main memory).
I noticed that superserver can take advantage of my dualcore whereas
class cannot. From the term "superserver" I assume that it is not a
lightweight database.
Can you guys confirm/deny this? What are some typical memory
footprints of each one (an actual number and units would be helpful).
Thanks in advance.
Julian