Hi Ann,

Vlad helped me to track down this issue, and it was just a false
alarm, probably caused by some bug in the validation code. I already
created a ticked in the tracker (CORE-1481)

Regards,

Fabiano.

On 9/28/07, Ann W. Harrison <aharrison@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Fabiano Bonin wrote:
>
> > Pointer page (sequence 0) lost in table (213)
> > Pointer page (sequence 0) lost in table (224)
> > Pointer page (sequence 0) lost in table (226)
> > Pointer page (sequence 0) lost in table (228)
>
> Hmmm.... Was anything stored in tables with rdb$relation_id
> of 213, 224, 226, and 228? If there was, it is possible
> that ib_aid could locate the data pages and reconstruct a
> pointer page for you. More likely, I'd guess, is that
> /something bad/ happened while the tables were being defined
> and part of the physical description didn't survive. That
> of course should never happen...
>
> Regards,
>
> Ann
>