Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Should updates be this slow? |
---|---|
Author | Anderson Farias |
Post date | 2007-09-05T15:48:43Z |
Hi,
slower depending on the code you write, thats why I asked.
go with Classic always! SS is too slow on SMP boxes (in this scenario) and
Classic is still good on single processor machines.
fb_inet_server.exe (Classic)
and "smaller" ones)
X2 is a AMD mobile technology, that's why I supposed it was a laptop =)
Anderson
> I have Helen's book, and I've been reading about them.Triggers are great, but be aware they can make updates/inserts significantly
slower depending on the code you write, thats why I asked.
> The customers of this machine can't be expected to know anythingIn this case, if your application is a Client/Server multi-user app I would
> about computers, or databases, or how many cores they have in their
> machines.
go with Classic always! SS is too slow on SMP boxes (in this scenario) and
Classic is still good on single processor machines.
> Is it possible I'm still running SuperServer?I donĀ“t think so
> Is there a way to find out which server I'm using?check task manager for a process called fbserver.exe (SS) or
fb_inet_server.exe (Classic)
> While my machine is modest, it's actually an HP Media Center PC,I think your machine it's just fine (I have done deployments on quite older
> for under the desk. I can understand why you would think it's a
> notebook from the specs I provided. :)
and "smaller" ones)
X2 is a AMD mobile technology, that's why I supposed it was a laptop =)
> ThanksRegards,
Anderson