Subject | Re: Linux Classic 2.x |
---|---|
Author | Thomas |
Post date | 2007-08-24T06:48:03Z |
Hi Alexandre,
Alexandre wrote:
would make a difference. I still do not see that it would make all that
much difference though. Tom said he had 16 GB of mem, so is could it
actually be an advantage since even with 1000 connections it will only
be 600MB mem vs. 400MB mem (@ 16k 1200MB vs. 800MB)? The reason I ask
is becuase I have always though that it was best to use as many pages
as possible before the OS swapping mem to disk. Further based on your
explanation is it ever an advantage to increase the cache pages then?
And does this same logic apply to SS?
Regards
Thomas Ellis
Alexandre wrote:
> Get it now ?thanks for the explanation I was also wondering why changing 75 to 50
would make a difference. I still do not see that it would make all that
much difference though. Tom said he had 16 GB of mem, so is could it
actually be an advantage since even with 1000 connections it will only
be 600MB mem vs. 400MB mem (@ 16k 1200MB vs. 800MB)? The reason I ask
is becuase I have always though that it was best to use as many pages
as possible before the OS swapping mem to disk. Further based on your
explanation is it ever an advantage to increase the cache pages then?
And does this same logic apply to SS?
Regards
Thomas Ellis