Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Does GBAK use temp folder? |
---|---|
Author | Svein Erling Tysvær |
Post date | 2007-11-08T08:12:58Z |
Wasn't there an undocumented table size limit of about 35GB? I'm just thinking that if this database contains one huge table of this size, then maybe it could still be an issue? What ODS and Dialect do you use?
Set
-----Original Message-----
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob Murdoch
Sent: 7. november 2007 19:38
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [firebird-support] Does GBAK use temp folder?
-----Original Message-----
size was 35GB.
Bob M..
Set
-----Original Message-----
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob Murdoch
Sent: 7. november 2007 19:38
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [firebird-support] Does GBAK use temp folder?
-----Original Message-----
> From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Leyne, Sean
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:31 PMexplorer
>
>
> I suspect that the folder compression is the source of the problem.
>
> What is the "on disk" size of the file (vs. the file size which
> is reporting)?If I remember correctly, the on disk size was 12GB, whereas the file
>
> (I suspect that the compression has a limit of 2 or 4 GB for the
> compressed file/image).
size was 35GB.
Bob M..