Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Does GBAK use temp folder? |
---|---|
Author | Bob Murdoch |
Post date | 2007-11-06T20:16:25Z |
-----Original Message-----
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ann W. Harrison
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:35 PM
backup failure. In fact, the backup files were all automatically
deleted after failure.
A slightly larger exerpt of the backup log:
gbak: 1280000 records written
gbak: 1300000 records written
gbak: 1320000 records written
gbak: 1340000 records written
gbak: 1360000 records written
gbak: ERROR: free disk space exhausted
gbak: Exiting before completion due to errors
The command line looks like this:
%BinDir%\gbak -b -user %DBUser% -pas %DBPwd% -ig -nt -v -y
%LogDir%\%BackupLogFile% %DBServerName%:%DBDir%\%DBName%
%BackupDir%\01%DBName%.Bak 2000000000 %BackupDir%\02%DBName%.Bak
2000000000 %BackupDir%\03%DBName%.Bak 2000000000
%BackupDir%\04%DBName%.Bak 2000000000 %BackupDir%\05%DBName%.Bak
2000000000 %BackupDir%\06%DBName%.Bak 2000000000
%BackupDir%\07%DBName%.Bak 2000000000 %BackupDir%\08%DBName%.Bak
2000000000 %BackupDir%\09%DBName%.Bak 2000000000
%BackupDir%\10%DBName%.Bak
When this script was written in the old days, we were trying to keep
the backup files under 2GB. Now, we get 9 of those, and one big
whopper at the end. I guess we could eliminate all of the backup
files but the last one, however, I doubt that is directly related to
our problem.
Bob M..
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ann W. Harrison
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:35 PM
> Bob Murdoch wrote:Every
> > I have a 61GB database on FB 1.5 Classic on a Win2k3 Server.
> > night, we run a backup and restore of this database on a seperatefive
> > server. The last few nights the backup has failed after about
> > hours, with an error in the backup log stating " gbak: ERROR: freeDefinitely on the backup. The restore was never kicked off due to the
> > disk space exhausted".
>
> Was the failure actually on the backup, not on the restore? I
> can imagine a restore using a lot of space since it has to recreate
> indexes and does by sorting all indexed records.
backup failure. In fact, the backup files were all automatically
deleted after failure.
A slightly larger exerpt of the backup log:
gbak: 1280000 records written
gbak: 1300000 records written
gbak: 1320000 records written
gbak: 1340000 records written
gbak: 1360000 records written
gbak: ERROR: free disk space exhausted
gbak: Exiting before completion due to errors
The command line looks like this:
%BinDir%\gbak -b -user %DBUser% -pas %DBPwd% -ig -nt -v -y
%LogDir%\%BackupLogFile% %DBServerName%:%DBDir%\%DBName%
%BackupDir%\01%DBName%.Bak 2000000000 %BackupDir%\02%DBName%.Bak
2000000000 %BackupDir%\03%DBName%.Bak 2000000000
%BackupDir%\04%DBName%.Bak 2000000000 %BackupDir%\05%DBName%.Bak
2000000000 %BackupDir%\06%DBName%.Bak 2000000000
%BackupDir%\07%DBName%.Bak 2000000000 %BackupDir%\08%DBName%.Bak
2000000000 %BackupDir%\09%DBName%.Bak 2000000000
%BackupDir%\10%DBName%.Bak
When this script was written in the old days, we were trying to keep
the backup files under 2GB. Now, we get 9 of those, and one big
whopper at the end. I guess we could eliminate all of the backup
files but the last one, however, I doubt that is directly related to
our problem.
Bob M..