On 10/24/07, Helen Borrie <helebor@...> wrote:
> Firebird itself will eventually commit transactions left hanging from lost connections but,
> going by info you have provided so far, your SQLConnection is not being abandoned, just
> neglected...(just guessing....)

My understanding was that transactions from lost connections would be
rolledback rather than committed. From my experimentation that does
seem to be the case. Under what circumstances does Firebird commit a
transaction that was left by a lost connection? Does that happen if
the transaction was only used to read data, or do some writes get
committed too?

Regards
Gareth Marshall