Subject | Firebird performance question |
---|---|
Author | thefourie2000 |
Post date | 2006-08-01T07:23:16Z |
Hi all...
I'm running a small application against a small FB 2.0 RC 3 database
The main functions used by my application are giving me the following
results
Function 1 - 0.001956ms - Avg time per execute. The function does 1 to
3 SELECTS against a table containing around approx 29500 records.
Selection is done on 1 column
Function 2 - 0.623543ms - Avg time per execute. The function does 1 to
3 SELECTS against a table containing around approx 29500 records.
Selection is done on 1 column
Function 3 - 0.750933ms - Avg time per execute. The function does 1 to
3 SELECTS against a table containing around approx 29500 records.
Selection is done on 1 column
Function 4 - 0.667124ms - Avg time per execute. The function does a
SINGLE SELECT against a table containing approx 775000 records.
Selection is done on 1 column
Function 5 - 5.906617ms - Avg time per execute. The function will run
1 to 3 queries against a table containing approx 29500 records.
Selection is done on 2 -> 3 columns
At present the total time to process approx 27000 records is around
320 seconds
All columns used by the select statements of the various functions are
indexed. I've got no compound indices at the moment. Would they
improve performance?
The application and database are hosted on a WinXP Pro, AMD 4200 Dual
Core, with 1GB RAM and 160GB SATA disk. I'm using the embedded client
libraries to access the DB. I've set the buffer size of the database
to 50000. Which showed a marked increase in performance.
Do these numbers look fairly decent for a firebird installation. Is
there any advice with regarding to tweaking the embedded driver setup
to improve caching / performance? My queries are all very simple
single table selects. "SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE X = 'D' AND Y = 'C'
AND Z = 'E' type stuff.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. If any more info is required
just shout ;)
Thanks in advance
Cronje
I'm running a small application against a small FB 2.0 RC 3 database
The main functions used by my application are giving me the following
results
Function 1 - 0.001956ms - Avg time per execute. The function does 1 to
3 SELECTS against a table containing around approx 29500 records.
Selection is done on 1 column
Function 2 - 0.623543ms - Avg time per execute. The function does 1 to
3 SELECTS against a table containing around approx 29500 records.
Selection is done on 1 column
Function 3 - 0.750933ms - Avg time per execute. The function does 1 to
3 SELECTS against a table containing around approx 29500 records.
Selection is done on 1 column
Function 4 - 0.667124ms - Avg time per execute. The function does a
SINGLE SELECT against a table containing approx 775000 records.
Selection is done on 1 column
Function 5 - 5.906617ms - Avg time per execute. The function will run
1 to 3 queries against a table containing approx 29500 records.
Selection is done on 2 -> 3 columns
At present the total time to process approx 27000 records is around
320 seconds
All columns used by the select statements of the various functions are
indexed. I've got no compound indices at the moment. Would they
improve performance?
The application and database are hosted on a WinXP Pro, AMD 4200 Dual
Core, with 1GB RAM and 160GB SATA disk. I'm using the embedded client
libraries to access the DB. I've set the buffer size of the database
to 50000. Which showed a marked increase in performance.
Do these numbers look fairly decent for a firebird installation. Is
there any advice with regarding to tweaking the embedded driver setup
to improve caching / performance? My queries are all very simple
single table selects. "SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE X = 'D' AND Y = 'C'
AND Z = 'E' type stuff.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. If any more info is required
just shout ;)
Thanks in advance
Cronje