Subject | Re: Zebedee, Firebird, and Dynamic DNS |
---|---|
Author | Milan Babuskov |
Post date | 2006-06-16T07:13:59Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Joe Martinez <joe@...> wrote:
difference.
a paper available on setting up the tunnel with stunnel:
http://www.ibphoenix.com/downloads/Secure_connections_to_Firebird_with_Stunnel.pdf
I'm not sure if stunnel also gives compression though.
OTOH, SSH supports compression for sure, but I haven't seen some
Firebird specific paper on it. Better google for some general ssh
tunnel info. It is quite similar to zebedee.
M.
> I don't think that the "ping" idea will make a difference becausePing is ICMP protocol, not TCP/IP so I don't think it would make any
> they were getting disconnected when there was plenty of successful
> activity right before the disconnect.
difference.
> Any other ideas? Is there another solution that would speed upYou could setup a tunnel using OpenSSH or via SSL (stunnel). There is
> their performance besides ZeBeDee that may be more "tolerant"?
a paper available on setting up the tunnel with stunnel:
http://www.ibphoenix.com/downloads/Secure_connections_to_Firebird_with_Stunnel.pdf
I'm not sure if stunnel also gives compression though.
OTOH, SSH supports compression for sure, but I haven't seen some
Firebird specific paper on it. Better google for some general ssh
tunnel info. It is quite similar to zebedee.
M.