Subject | Re: FB 1.5 vs. Win2003 + Xeon |
---|---|
Author | Anderson Farias |
Post date | 2006-06-07T01:17:03Z |
Hi Adam, thanks for your comments
|Well if you have already set the CPU affinity (and restarted the
|service after making the change), then that won't be your problem.
yes
|What does '[very] bad performances' mean?
Mean it runs "update and/or select" stored procs at least 10x slower than
any other simpler machines put as server.
|Is FBServer CPU bound / IO Bound / not getting a chance to run
|because the server is also running X, Y and Z?
not really.
BTW, on the 4 server cpu, it is noticed some times a 100% cpu usage (the cpu
used by FB) usually when running some "heavy processes" against the
database.
|What is the file extension?
.fdb
|Are you using (drive) shadowing?
no
...I´ll try switching to Firebird Classic as sugested by Rob Martin (btw,
thanks Rob) on both servers, and see what happens.
I could also try to disable HT and see if it is the problem, but I think
people will not like this solution best. :-)
Regards,
Anderson Farias
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|Well if you have already set the CPU affinity (and restarted the
|service after making the change), then that won't be your problem.
yes
|What does '[very] bad performances' mean?
Mean it runs "update and/or select" stored procs at least 10x slower than
any other simpler machines put as server.
|Is FBServer CPU bound / IO Bound / not getting a chance to run
|because the server is also running X, Y and Z?
not really.
BTW, on the 4 server cpu, it is noticed some times a 100% cpu usage (the cpu
used by FB) usually when running some "heavy processes" against the
database.
|What is the file extension?
.fdb
|Are you using (drive) shadowing?
no
...I´ll try switching to Firebird Classic as sugested by Rob Martin (btw,
thanks Rob) on both servers, and see what happens.
I could also try to disable HT and see if it is the problem, but I think
people will not like this solution best. :-)
Regards,
Anderson Farias
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]